1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna

holybikinisbatman asked:

I don't know if you're still answering questions like this, but is it possible to get a break down of the genders that identified as asexual, and the genders that also identified as intersex? (I'm not sure how to word that best, so I hope that is intelligible...) regardless, I love seeing your content!

Among asexual respondents, we saw the following gender identities:

  • Any trans or nonbinary identity: 68.3%
  • Any Nonbinary identity: 63.8%
  • Nonbinary: 48.8%
  • Any feminine identity: 42.9%
  • Trans: 41.4%
  • Female: 38.4%
  • Queer: 37.3%
  • Cis: 29.4%
  • Woman: 27.2%
  • Genderqueer: 27%
  • Agender: 26.9%
  • Any masculine identity: 21.9%
  • Transmasculine: 15.8%
  • Genderfluid or genderflux: 14.4%
  • Male: 14%
  • Demigender: 12.2%
  • Man: 9.1%
  • Transneutral: 8.9%
  • Genderfuck or Genderpunk: 5.2%
  • Neurogenders: 4.5%
  • Transfeminine: 2.6%


Among intersex respondents, we saw the following gender identities:

  • Any trans or nonbinary identity: 91.5%
  • Any nonbinary identity: 84.7%
  • Nonbinary: 79.7%
  • Queer: 44.1%
  • Genderqueer: 37.3%
  • Any masculine identity: 32.2%
  • Transmasculine: 25.4%
  • Any feminine identity: 23.7%
  • Female: 22%
  • Male: 22%
  • Demigender: 16.9%
  • Neurogenders: 16.9%
  • Genderfluid or Genderflux: 15.3%
  • Woman: 15.3%
  • Man: 13.5%
  • Genderfuck or Genderpunk: 11.9%
  • Agender: 11.9%
  • Transneutral: 10.2%
  • Cisgender: 6.8%
  • Transfeminine: 3.4%
  • Transfeminine: 2.6%

Support our work, or read more about it:

Gender Intersex Asexual Results Results 2018 3500 holybikinisbatman

More you might like

qesurvey
qesurvey

Posts on this project have already been flagged for removal by tumblr’s automated system.

The posts on this blog have been backed up to three locations: archive.org, archive.is, and my personal hardware.

As soon as a new location for hosting this project has been identified, I will let you know where we are moving to.

Thank you for your patience.

I know this is a hard time for all of us.

qesurvey

Our appeals may have been approved. The notification of posts being flagged has disappeared, but I have not received any kind of confirmation email.

I still intend to move this project to another public platform as soon as I find one whose spread and messaging functions I feel are appropriate to the project’s needs.

autismserenity
butts-bouncing-on-the-beltway

Calling all LGBTQIA+ folks

My agency is currently allowing me to direct it’s efforts to be more inclusive and positive towards LGBT+ clients. This means writing policy on what inclusive language looks like, what emotional and social support for LGBTQIA+ issues would look like, that sort of thing.

If you’re interested in contributing to this direction please let me know! This is with regards to both sexuality and gender and other aspects you as an LGBT+ person feel would be important.

You can either reply to this post that you’re interested, or message me directly on Tumblr.

This offer is on-going because it will likely be a long process however I really need some responses to start my proposals with by Friday 11/23/18.

Source: butts-bouncing-on-the-beltway
aftselakhis-shaladin
aroacepagans

Oh, btw cus I haven’t seen any posts about it yet, the 2018 asexual census survey is up, and people should defiantly go take it so that we can continue to have up to date information on community demographics.

You can find it here if you’re interested 

wardenofannwn

Why? Why is demographic information so important?

aroacepagans

Demographic information, and other information gathered by this survey can help us recognize and address community needs, gain funding for ace community issues, and help us improve research on asexuality.

If I’m trying to fund a group for ace sexual assault survivors, then I want hard numbers to show potential donors that will make them say “yes, this is a problem that I should put money twords”

If I’m doing research on the intersection between trans-antagonism and ace-antagonism then it helps to be able to access data on how many ace people identify as trans/GNC befor I start my research, so I can understand the scale of what I’m looking at.

Demographic information is important for a lot of things and the people who run the ace census very graciously synthesize and provide that information for us for free, so while no one is under any obligation to take the survey, I do highly suggest that you do whether you’re ace or not (they need comparative data as well). They do important work and if you have the time it’s good to participate.

Source: aroacepagans

vikomprenas asked:

"For the time being, as long as you provide credit, citation, or attribution, you are welcome to use the data and writing here freely." this is exactly CC-BY

So it is!

I have such a difficult time with copyright and legal terminology, even the ones intended to be highly accessible. That’s why I have a legal editor.

I’ll ask them to confirm this for me tomorrow, and see about getting one of those little buttons on here that lets people know about the attribution stuff.

vikomprenas

hailmaryfullofgrace55675 asked:

Hi. I'm updating an LGBTQ+ terminology webpage for my university. Can I, crediting you, use your definitions of prejudice, discrimination, oppression, heteronormativity, and gender binarism?

Absolutely!

If I ever manage to develop a comprehensive enough understanding of creative commons licenses, I imagine I’ll put up one of those eventually.

For the time being, as long as you provide credit, citation, or attribution, you are welcome to use the data and writing here freely.

hailmaryfullofgrace55675
thesaviorofmisbehavior
qesurvey

Hey so, you know how people in the notes of your posts like to claim how 10k responses is too small a response pool?

https://www.buzzfeed.com/dominicholden/lgbtq-in-the-us-poll

Here is an article abt a comprehensive poll of the LGBTQ community that has… 880 responses. Not even 10% of what y’all got. Y’all are good. (Granted, Buzzfeed is hardly the highest quality of news anywhere but still.)

—

You might be surprised about the quality of sourcing on Buzzfeed. The only issues they have with fact-checking are over 5 years old, or the result of trying to break news stories too quickly. In terms of research postings, they tend to be significantly higher quality than some more traditional, “mainstream” media sources.

This, of course, refers to their journalistic departments. Their entertainment department leaves much to be desired.

However, as this article comes from their journalism department, and as they are one of the few popular news outlets which offer extensive LGBT[…]+ news without being explicitly LGBT[…]+ focused, it’s quite a helpful resource.

I will say this: Buzzfeed has much, much more money than we do. Which is to say, any money at all. 

As such, they were able to high a national research group, WINS, to perform a more randomized and thus more representative survey. A sample of ~900 respondents is plenty large enough, when randomized, to draw some very significant conclusions about a population of 1.5 million people. 

Without access to a random population of LGBT[…]+ respondents, this survey requires a much larger sample to be comparably representative.

thesaviorofmisbehavior

Peer reviewed research journals have been know to accept qualitative studies with six participants and treat the findings as legitimate. I’ve seen quantitative peer reviewed articles with ~100 respondents, which is p common especially in psych, soc, and lgbt+/human sexuality studies. A small pool does not make the findings and trends less legitimate, it just means that someone else now has a platform to get funding for a larger project with a more representative sample.

Source: qesurvey

lesbiangerblin asked:

Have you looked into doing statistical analysis into the results that you get? Rather than just percentages, doing the math to see statistical significance and that kind of thing?

Due to the enormous sample sizes and limited randomization, any T-test is going to produce a p-value of less than 0.01, and an ANOVA test produces similar “highly significant,” values. Margin of error calculations will give a margin of well under the 0.1% I already use as my standard of publication on this blog.

For more detail on why I do not publish statistical analytics on this data on this blog, here are some previous posts on the methodology of this survey and its results.

bannibals

adhd-ruby-rose asked:

Do these percentages people ask about come from the 2017 survey, or the 2018 survey, since 2018 isnt done yet?

If no one specifies a year in their request, I use the most recent data (currently, 4,500 responses collected in 2018). 

The specific data set from which the percentages have been calculated is tagged on each post, in the format of “results [year] [population],” for example the current tag would be “results 2018 4500.”

agent-wash1ngtub
See this in the app Show more